Talk:EnergyAustralia (state government enterprise)

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / Queensland / Victoria Low‑importance

EnergyAustralia (state government enterprise) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).

More information:
/
	This article is not assigned to a WikiProject or workgroup. Please help with your suggestions.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Victoria, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:EnergyAustralia logo.gif

Image:EnergyAustralia logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

As TRUenergy acquired former EnergyAustralia retail business and rebranded itself as EnergyAustralia, we should probably merge these articles. As an alternative, keep these articles separated but rename this article EnergyAustralia (state government enterprise) to talk about the former company existing until 2011, and rename TRUenergy EnergyAustralia. Beagel (talk) 05:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Given that EnergyAustralia has a significant history of its own, merging them probably wouldn't be appropriate. But it's fair to surmise that people looking for "EnergyAustralia" are probably looking for its current incarnation rather than its previous one. So I'd support your latter suggestion - add some {{about}} dabnotes for clarity and it should work fine. (Renaming TRUEnergy to EnergyAustralia is necessary because the company has changed its name, from what I can tell - so the EnergyAustralia article is going to have to move.) Miracle Pen (talk) 06:31, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Questions So, to clarify,
- the proposal is:
  - move EnergyAustralia to EnergyAustralia (state government enterprise), or similar name
  - add some {{about}} dabnotes to the new page
  - get an admin to move TRUenergy to EnergyAustralia over the top of the redirects
  - add some {{about}} dabnotes to the "new" EnergyAustralia page
- Correct??
- What sort of "merging" (if any) would/should occur?

Pdfpdf (talk) 08:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Generally support the revised proposal. The only comment is the sort of merging that should occur is that the 100–year–old history rests with the EnergyAustralia (state government enterprise) (or similar name), and not with the EnergyAustralia/TRUenergy entity that is a subsidiary of the CLP Group. Perhaps the old EnergyAustralia logo would be appropriate to keep at EnergyAustralia (state government enterprise). Rangasyd (talk) 11:20, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Generally support per Rangasyd. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with Ranga's proposal to restore the old EnergyAustralia logo, which I've uploaded a copy of at: File:Energy Australia old logo.png. Miracle Pen (talk) 16:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. There seems to be consensus for moves and no support for a merger, so I removed merger proposal tags and continue with moves per revised proposals. Beagel (talk) 17:13, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]