Talk:Encephalartos
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
File:Encephalartos sclavoi reproductive cone.jpg to appear as POTD soon
[edit]Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Encephalartos sclavoi reproductive cone.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 8, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-05-08. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng {chat} 20:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Encephalartos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130729225440/http://152.111.1.87/argief/berigte/dieburger/1987/05/16/3/13.html to http://152.111.1.87/argief/berigte/dieburger/1987/05/16/3/13.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Removal of archaic/racist terminology from "commonly used" list at beginning of article?
[edit]The reference for citation #3 (on "kaffir bread") itself says that it is obsolete and offensive.
https://www.dsae.co.za/entry/kaffir/e03579
Why is this included? It was added quite recently. If this term is still used, it should NOT be listed at the beginning as a 'common usage' but mentioned lower down in its own Controversy section that links to the main wikipage on the racial slur in question.