Talk:Empire season 2

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wiki Loves Pride

This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2015.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride

Colour contrast problems

It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.

To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.

To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.

Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We work with facts, not rumours or 'what fans like to see'

I created this page a little while ago and I'm very happy with the result. Me and many of you keep the page up to date. Thanks for that. There is just one thing I don't like: contribitions that aren't taken seriously. When I checked the page today, I saw Zendaya listed as the recurring role of Laura with no source. It doesn't work like that. Wikipedia is a source of information builded on facts. That Zendaya is appearing on the show: it's just something a fan wants, but it is not the reality as long there are no sources to that information. Same with Oprah Winfrey appearing on the show. There have been some talks, but it seems like Oprah isn't appearing in any of the upcoming season two episodes, as it was said in an interview with Ilene Chaiken. Also unconfirmed information: Keke Palmer as Betty Barz. I will delete Keke's name and bring it back to TBA, as long there is no actress confirmed for the role.

We work with the hard sources here, we're not just fans that are rooting for some stars to appear on the show. Let that be clear.

Have a great day, IMikee (talk) 20:13, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Over the past couple of days, I have noticed several edits with unreliable sources which claims the information to be true. One user have added several titles with SpoilerTV as their source, however SpoilerTV is an unreliable source, per https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Television#Reception_sources. Several websites, such as SpoilerTV, publish information about TV shows, but do not mention their original source for the info, thus making it an unreliable source. Other unreliable sources one should not use is:

Twotimer17 (talk) 16:08, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Number of episodes next to characters and/or actors & actresses

Hi there. On Season 1 of Empire's page, there is nothing noting how many episodes each are in. May I ask why this page does so? Should they not be the same? Thank-you. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 05:08, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kiraroshi1976: You are right, both pages should be the same, and according to MOS:TVCAST should not have episode counts in the cast list.–Dark Cocoa Frosting (talk) 12:16, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I shall take them off. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 19:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Backgrounds

Hi, I can't help but notice that season two and season 1 articles use the same shade as the background. Aren't they supposed to be different or am I wrong? Cheers-- Nyanchoka : talk 2 me 20:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Empire (season 2). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6cZoSk5KN?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftvbythenumbers.zap2it.com%2F2015%2F10%2F26%2Fbroadcast-live-7-ratings-week-3-2015-16%2F480276%2F to http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2015/10/26/broadcast-live-7-ratings-week-3-2015-16/480276/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Empire (season 2). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]