This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Genealogy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genealogy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GenealogyWikipedia:WikiProject GenealogyTemplate:WikiProject GenealogyGenealogy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
These articles seem to satisfy the criteria for notability under WP:NCORP. RoySmith disagrees. Full discussion is at (talk). As a note, I am an employee of Embark, though the original author approached me saying they thought Embark should have a Wikipedia page given notability and then wrote it themselves, and then re-approached me only when it was rejected. I believe the page they wrote does not cross any self-promotion guidelines, and the entire reason RoySmith rejected the page was specifically because he believed it failed the notability criteria, and specifically stated that the articles below do not establish notability even if they were included in the page. If there are other edits that need to be made for other reasons, I'm sure the author would be happy to do so, but first we need to be clear these articles establish notability. Thank you. DogDaysOfSummer1990 (talk·contribs) 19:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]