Talk:Email Surveillance/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article is mainly sourced to blogs and even a Wikipedia mirror (enotes) is cited. Much of the content is unsourced. The writing of the plot summary is not great (some typos, clunky). The reception section is very underdeveloped. I am skeptical of the fair use justification for File:Jimsurveillance.jpg. Mainly the almost complete lack of reliable sourcing means this is C-class, not a Good Article. Fences&Windows 17:34, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted, marked as C-class. Fences&Windows 01:14, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]