Talk:Ella, elle l'a
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ella, elle l'a article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Alizee
[edit]and alizee? she sang this song —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.9.182.205 (talk) 02:18, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Title
[edit]I disagree with "Ella, she has it" as the English translation of the title, and suggest [again] that "Ella's Got It" more faithfully captures the French feel of the lyric. The translation has been revised a number of times, so I'll refrain from changing it again. neil.steiner (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- I once changed it to "Ella, she's got it". I can live with the currect translation (Ella, she has it):
- Ella = Ella
- elle = she
- l' = it
- a = has
- but still think that that is too "formal". That's why I changed it - it sounded better. But leaving out "she" would be incorrect.
- Richard 07:28, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Richard, I agree that "she" should indeed be part of a literal word-for-word translation. I'm not arguing for a change, but in my opinion, the current translation misses the playfulness and colloquialness of the French title. Just my two cents. neil.steiner (talk) 02:31, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- What I meant was that in my opinion, while leaving she out of Ella, she's got it (resulting in Ella's got it) is not unacceptable, leaving it out of Ella, she has it (→ Ella has it) would be wrong. Richard 08:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- I disagree that "she" should be included in the translation. Translations are not meant to be word-by-word but true to the meaning. Including "she" is the result of insufficient command of the French language (or English, for that matter). In French, this combination is simply meant to stress the subject. In English the usage is different. If someone says, "moi, je suis d'accord", it does not mean, "me, I am ok with it", but simply, "I am okay with it". Similarly, if someone asks, "la jeunesse a-t-elle une histoire?", it does not mean, "youth, does it have a history?" but simply "does youth have a history". Such differences must be taken into consideration when translating. This is such a basic matter that it is usually taught in the first year of learning a foreign language. Therefore, I am removing "she" from the title. Please do not re-add without strong proof that I'm wrong (I'm not).TobyDZ (talk) 23:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- To stress the subject - that's exactly why Ella's got it sounded better in my ears. In Ella has it there's no 'visible' stress. Richard 08:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- I disagree that "she" should be included in the translation. Translations are not meant to be word-by-word but true to the meaning. Including "she" is the result of insufficient command of the French language (or English, for that matter). In French, this combination is simply meant to stress the subject. In English the usage is different. If someone says, "moi, je suis d'accord", it does not mean, "me, I am ok with it", but simply, "I am okay with it". Similarly, if someone asks, "la jeunesse a-t-elle une histoire?", it does not mean, "youth, does it have a history?" but simply "does youth have a history". Such differences must be taken into consideration when translating. This is such a basic matter that it is usually taught in the first year of learning a foreign language. Therefore, I am removing "she" from the title. Please do not re-add without strong proof that I'm wrong (I'm not).TobyDZ (talk) 23:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Ella, elle l'a. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522135357/http://www.austriancharts.at/1988_single.asp to http://www.austriancharts.at/1988_single.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807111205/http://www.hitparade.ch:80/year.asp?key=1988 to http://hitparade.ch/year.asp?key=1988
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6B29Du2Wp?url=http://www.radio1.gr/music/forthcoming_uk_singles.htm to http://www.radio1.gr/music/forthcoming_uk_singles.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140125154811/http://www.ultratop.be/nl/annual.asp?year=2008 to http://www.ultratop.be/nl/annual.asp?year=2008
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719010101/http://www.hitlistan.se/netdata/ghl002.mbr/lista?liid=43&dfom=20080001&newi=0&height=420&platform=Win32&browser=MSIE&navi=no&subframe=Mainframe to http://www.hitlistan.se/netdata/ghl002.mbr/lista?liid=43&dfom=20080001&newi=0&height=420&platform=Win32&browser=MSIE&navi=no&subframe=Mainframe
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ella, elle l'a. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081029221052/http://www.mahasz.hu/m/?menu=slagerlistak&menu2=radios_top_40 to http://mahasz.hu/m/?menu=slagerlistak&menu2=radios_top_40
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120511135554/http://mahasz.hu/?menu=slagerlistak&menu2=eves_osszesitett_listak&id=radios&ev=2008 to http://www.mahasz.hu/?menu=slagerlistak&menu2=eves_osszesitett_listak&id=radios&ev=2008
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130621061430/http://promusicae.es/files/listasanuales/canciones/Top%2050%20CANCIONES%20%20ANUAL%202008.pdf to http://www.promusicae.es/files/listasanuales/canciones/Top%2050%20CANCIONES%20%20ANUAL%202008.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)