Talk:Elizabeth F. Ellet

Elizabeth F. Ellet has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 8, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 19, 2007.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Elizabeth F. Ellet was the first writer to record the lives of women who contributed to and survived the American Revolutionary War?

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ellet/Osgood/Poe scandal

I have added a fairly substantial section on the Ellet/Osgood/Poe scandal to Virginia Eliza Clemm Poe, in case anyone is interested. The most interesting part, I think, is when Virginia claims on her deathbed that Ellet was her murderer. Harsh words! --Midnightdreary (talk) 14:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A bit late, but I went ahead and added a lot of this info to this article, as well as info on her situation with Rufus Griswold. I also went ahead and started a basic lead, but it could really use some improvement if anyone wants to undertake the challenge. A few more footnotes and some expansion on her later life might get this article suitable for a good article review... --Midnightdreary (talk) 02:47, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the push, I deleted a large quote I had in there (I don't remember why I put that in there?). It wasn't relevant to her bio at all. Added more about her major work, still more to do there. I will try to add a bit more to her later years. Maybe more pics? - Epousesquecido (talk) 18:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly! We should also try to establish a page for her on Wikisource. --Midnightdreary (talk) 19:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisource page is done. - Epousesquecido (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA nom

When is this article going up for GA? It seems about ready to me... (no way is it "start" any more!... it's at least B if not A) ++Lar: t/c 20:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we're close but I'm not confident it's ready yet. Her later life (27 years) crams into only three paragraphs; I'm sure there's more to talk about. I think more footnotes would help, too (i.e. under "Career"). My guess is that the GA reviewer might request a Bibliography or List of works. I think the lead could expand a bit too. --Midnightdreary (talk) 02:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I should also note that the referencing style isn't 100% consistent - it looks like I was using a different style. Sorry! ;) --Midnightdreary (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's sorted now. This surely is GA. Heck, it's almost FA, if you ask me. Maybe some more expansion of the works related stuff but... ++Lar: t/c 20:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is ready for GA nomination now. Epousesquecido, I'll let you handle the honors. --Midnightdreary (talk) 12:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated...- Epousesquecido (talk) 13:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck. I'll try to lend a hand as I can. ++Lar: t/c 14:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

I certainly agree this article meets the GA criteria, and I don't think a simple checklist review will be helpful here. Instead, I'll point out some things that will help this article pass FA.

Contemporary criticism. The archives of the New York Times are all online, and searchable back to 1850 or so. This is old enough to get some reviews of her work. You must choose the appropriate time-range from a drop-down box. This is a useful first step, it may be that some of you have access to specialist libraries which would allow you to go further.
Her works: More commentary on her works would be helpful - at the moment, only one or two are discussed in detail.
Legacy: What, if any, effect did Ellet's work have on modern scholars? It's said she's still read today, so there must be something of note to say about her, perhaps even modern criticism, all of which is missing.

Fix these, and I think you're in good straits to move into FA. Good luck! Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 18:12, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the by, this would be a good addition. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 11:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's been there a while, as it is current ref #6. I found it interesting that her family had so much land... (the ref is underused, there are other tidbits that could be used in the article...) ++Lar: t/c 10:36, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elizabeth F. Ellet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elizabeth F. Ellet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pinn.net/~sunshine/whm2002/ellet.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090919235721/http://www.writersrisingup.org/efeinterpretivetrail/docs/Grand_Opening_2007.pdf to http://www.writersrisingup.org/efeinterpretivetrail/docs/Grand_Opening_2007.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]