This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Rather than yet again removing the two spurious portraits (one of her daughter, one of someone else entirely), I have left them in the article with explanatory captions. They are so commonly misidentified as Lady Conyngham that it is inevitable that someone will upload another copy to Commons with the wrong identification, and copy them to this article, perhaps substituting them (reasoning that they are "better" because they are in color?) for the genuine 1801 portrait, which is unfortunately only available in black and white.
I have also restored the 1801 Sir Thomas Lawrence full-length portrait at the top of the article. Please do not replace it again unless a high-res color version of it becomes available. Laura1822 (talk) 16:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
