Jump to content

Talk:Elizabeth Berg (author)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2009 deletion proposal

[edit]

I removed the following deletion proposal from the article: {{dated prod|concern = dubious [[WP:BIO|notability]]|month = January|day = 5|year = 2009|time = 20:20|timestamp = 20090105202019}}. Since this article was created, it has carried a box requesting better sources. I wish I had better sources to cite, but the fact remains that she has authored a dozen books that are sold online and available in libraries, and one of them has an article of its own. As far as I know, there is no suspicion that any particular detail in her bioagraphy is false. But the additional claim that she is of dubious notability is new to me. Could you detail exactly how this particular author is of dubious notability? Which item in the notability guidelines does the article violate? --LA2 (talk) 20:35, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a matter of "violating' WP:BIO so much as failing to meet it with a lack of independent, verifiable and reliable sources. At least in my opinion, the author's website, her publisher, and a reseller have a conflict of interest in promoting this author. We could do well with the ABBY award winners list, but I can't even find the ABBY Award here on Wikipedia. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:13, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, so it's the lack of sources? Not some limit on the number of published works? I acknowledge the current lack of sources and will try to improve that. Have you considered Oprah's listing as an indirect source? Just out of curiosity, have you compared the singer Elizabeth Berg and found that article better or worse than this one about the author? --LA2 (talk) 22:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All sources are added now

[edit]

Kindly check it out. InfocenterM (talk) 18:15, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Elizabeth Berg (author). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]