Jump to content

Talk:Elinor Joseph

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Incorrect premise

[edit]

It appears that the premise of this article, and indeed the DYK fact, was: "in 2010 Elinor Joseph became the first Arab woman to serve in a combat role in the Israel Defense Forces?"

However, a simple look in See also reveals that in fact Amira al Hayb, a Bedouin (Bedouins are Arabs) served in a combat position before Elinor Joseph.

Should we say "the first Arab non-Bedouin woman ..." ?

Ynhockey (Talk) 14:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Visually appealing Christian woman

[edit]

She is considered to be a visually appealing Christian woman, and a link should be made to her interview she did on TV - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6U1tCTUApJ4 110.33.120.196 (talk) 11:31, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, I don't think calling anyone "visually appealing" on a Wikipedia article is consistent with NPOV and other guidelines unless, perhaps, in direct quotation. Not recommended, either way. 213.109.230.96 (talk) 20:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is Joseph's religious background?

[edit]

Maronite Catholic, Greek Catholic, Orthodox Catholic? A Google search for "elinor joseph maronite" has suggested some informal sources claiming her to be Maronite, but this is not enough. 213.109.230.96 (talk) 20:49, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elinor Joseph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elinor Joseph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]