Talk:Eleusis (card game)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Eleusis
[edit]http://web.periodic-kingdom.org/Activities/Eleusis/ gave me 404 not found .... any replacement, or should be removed? --Bilboq 12:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Weasel words
[edit]The game is "sometimes" considered a model of the scientific method by whom? Citations, please. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.90.17.134 (talk • contribs) 12:37, 29 July 2007.
Broken and useless links
[edit]At least one link is broken, another points to a very poorly written, perhaps machine-translated, page that tells the reader "Whoever interested in it may dig Internet for this."
Very helpful. This article should be removed until someone qualified and interested can start it from scratch. Currently it's an annoying waste of time for readers. The link from the Mao article should be removed also, to avoid sending people on a wild goose chase.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.90.17.134 (talk • contribs) 12:37, 29 July 2007.
Eleusis+Nobel: huh?
[edit]The below line currently appears in the article. I have no idea what it means. Some Googling led me to an impression that Eleusis+Nobel is a "network game" based on Eleusis, but I don't know what that means either. I'm leaving the sentence in the article for now, but it doesn't make any sense without more info. If anyone knows anything more about Eleusis+Nobel, please expand this sentence (in the article); otherwise, we should cut the sentence entirely. --Elysdir (talk) 17:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The formalisation of Eleusis+Nobel inspired new modes of communication by exchange of logical notes[1].
References
- ^ Jean Sallantin, Christophe Douy, Abdelkader Gouaich, Juan Carlos Martinez, Denis Pierre, Antoine Seilles, Jean-Baptiste Soufron, Jean-Philippe Cointet: "A Logical Framework to Annotate Documents in a VirtualAgora " – Square of Opposition 07