Jump to content

Talk:Elephant flow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References

[edit]

http://www.cs.unc.edu/~jeffay/papers/SIGMETRICS-01.pdf F.D. Smith, F. Hernández-Campos, K. Jeffay, and D. Ott, What TCP/IP Protocol Headers Can Tell Us About the Web, Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS 2001/Performance 2001, Cambridge, MA, June 2001, pages 245-256.

10.1.1.79.2705.pdf Mice and Elephants Visualization of Internet Traffic J. S. Marron (School of Operations Research and Industrial Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA and Department of Statistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3260, USA), Felix Hernandez-Campos (Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175, USA) and F. D. Smith (Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175, USA)

Liang Guo; Matta, I.; "The War Between Mice and Elephants" Dept. of Comput. Sci., Boston Univ., MA, USA 11-14 Nov. 2001, pp 180 - 188, ISBN: 0-7695-1429-4, DOI 10.1109/ICNP.2001.992898 www.ieee-icnp.org/2001/papers/2001-20.pdf

 kgrr talk 20:14, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First sentence makes no sense

[edit]

The first sentence reads "In computer networking, an elephant flow is an extremely large (in total bytes) continuous flow set up by a TCP (or other protocol) flow measured over a network link." Taking out the parenthesized bit makes it easier to see: "In computer networking, an elephant flow is an extremely large continuous flow set up by a TCP flow measured over a network link." 109.148.210.43 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't elephant derived from RFC 1072?

[edit]

See LFN or elephan(t) as defined in RFC 1072. The internet is effectively an LFN but the problems of LFNs only arise when a flow attempts to use the bandwidth. Hence a flow on the internet to which RFC 1072 might be relevant is clearly an elephant. However, I can't verify that; maybe someone else can. At the very least a reference to the other usage of elephan(t) would be useful. Tsgsh (talk) 16:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elephant flow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elephant flow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]