Talk:Elendil/Archive 1

Archive 1

Untitled

If this is copyrighted by "Willliam R. Jones", then must remove this text. I don't believe 67.0.133.187 was stating copyright, but rather stating his own name. (And, if you don't know what I'm blabbing about, look at the history of the Elendil page.) Same applies for Narya. --Mrwojo

Fair use rationale for Image:Elendil11.jpg

Image:Elendil11.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Broken box

The Tolkien character infobox was damaged, making this page inaccessible. I have temporarily removed it. Wachholder 05:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Reference

Part of the height reference can be obtained from Unfinished tails (see 'ranga' in the index p369-70?) Note tolkien only said he was "more than man high by nearly half a ranga" the rest is original research of a sort.(too accurate)

Changed the text.. and added a reference.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.88.218 (talk) 15:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Can anyone supply a reference for the other height? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.88.218 (talk) 14:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Adaptations

Do we need to mention the use of Narsil by Aragorn in the live-action films? In particular I'm challenging the phrase "Though Aragorn uses his [Elendil's] name as a battle cry, he is never identified with it while on-screen. However, in the third film, Aragorn mentions that Andúril (former Narsil) was "the sword of Elendil" when Elrond gives him the reforged blade." Adaptations are about the portrayal of the character, and because the Bakshi film doesn't show any depiction of Elendil himself it is reasonable to refer to the sword. But the live-action films have a live (and later a dead) Elendil in the prologue to The Fellowship which is mentioned in the article, and so I think that's sufficient. De728631 (talk) 21:37, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

The thing is, in the trilogy the name "Elendil" is never linked with "the King of the Humans". In the prologue of TFotR it is said "...when Isildur, son of the King...", but the character is never named. Although Aragorn uses the name as a battle cry, the viewers still don't know the name of the King, and the word "Elendil" cried by Aragorn tell them nothing about that, but a cool cry. So, I added that phrase because it's the only way the viewers have to put a name on that character. To say "the sword of Elendil" makes the viewers remember the owner of the sword, and solve the mystery. That's my point. I think that phrase is really harmless, but I'm not going to make a big deal for such thing. Regards, Kordas (sínome!) 09:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

You've got a point there, Kordas. But the "sword of Elendil" is already explained in the paragraph about the Bakshi film, that's why I think we don't need to mention it twice. De728631 (talk) 20:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

But I'm talking about another different film from Bakshi's. It's a logical nexus that I'm proposing, but as I said, it's no big deal for me if the phrase is going to be deleted. Kordas (sínome!) 23:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)