Talk:Ejovi Nuwere

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 March 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

This page should not be speedily deleted because Ejovi Nuwere is the publisher of a leading news journal in Japan. He is also the co-founder of a large global technology company, FON. He also has a published autobiography by Harper Collins/William Morrow one of the world's largest publishers. There appears to be several references to him already on Wikipedia. Nuwere is also a columnist for Sankei Shimbun, Japan's 3rd largest newspaper publisher. --Hwaiwey (talk) 06:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Tokyo Times appears to be completely non-notable. It's comparable to any small time independent online news publication in the US, most cities have several. It's pretty amateurish. It is certainly not a leading news journal. If you could provide more links for the Saneki Shimbun journalism that would be great, but as it is I can't tell that he really has written to any degree or gotten any attention for such writing. There is also no indication that FON or any other companies mentioned are "large" or "global". Beach drifter (talk) 02:40, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are probably a dozen mentions of FON currently in Google news and many of them refer to FON as the worlds largest wireless network.
Wikipedia states on notability "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." are Wired, Boston Globe, Businessweek and Techworld/IDG not reliable secondary sources?
The Washington Post is a independent news publication that only has print in the Washington DC area. By your definition its a small time independent "mostly" online news publication in the USA. Does that make it less significant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hwaiwey (talk • contribs) 05:26, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Honestly I'm having trouble finding sources for this article. http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2005-10-24/from-hacker-to-protector is a good one, the others listed in the article are no good and google isn't turning up much else. Beach drifter (talk) 15:51, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

None of these supporting links are valid. The Wired articles indicates the book claims cannot be verified. Most of the other links go to pages that don't exist or have any reference to the individual. The article seems highly self-serving and attempting to add legitimacy to unverifiable facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ws1645 (talk • contribs) 22:52, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trashy tabloid writing style

"...and organized a A-list of digerati to join the company..."

There are so many things wrong with this I don't even know where to start.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ejovi Nuwere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130308041436/https://www.sixapart.com/blog/2007/12/on-stage-with-otorevo.html to https://www.sixapart.com/blog/2007/12/on-stage-with-otorevo.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]