Talk:Eisenhower Tunnel

Eisenhower Tunnel has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 6, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
April 10, 2010	WikiProject A-class review	Not approved

Current status: Good article

Bridges and Tunnels Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Colorado Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Eisenhower Tunnel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Remember to state that it is the United States.
The lead states it is among the last parts of the Interstate to be completed, but doesn't say which year.
Perhaps mention the number of lanes in the lead.
I think you are doing a number of that/which errors—check out the rules, they confuse even me, and I wasn't aware of it until a featured nomination of mine. Those types of errors are beyond the scope of GA.
When writing in past tense, use "were" instead of "would be".
When converting currency, don't say "today", say "as of [year]".
Ref 3 needs a title.

Nice, well-written and interesting article. Some small things, so I'm placing it on hold. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. I will try to get to these this weekend. Dave (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arsenikk, can you specify what types of errors are found in the article and how they could be fixed? Thanks. --Pzoxicuvybtnrm 22:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arsenikk, thank you for the review and kind words. I believe between Pz and my fixes we have fixed everything you have noted. I also am not skilled with grammar; however, I have noted the overuse of the word that and which. I have removed/fixed some instances. Please advise if you find any more issues. Thanks again. Dave (talk) 06:58, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pz: the list was complete for all the non-good things I found. All in all, above average for a GA nomination. By the way, I may have faulted in the currency thing, if you are using {{inflation}}, then it is okay to use that syntax (I was at the time not aware of this automatic process). Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 08:20, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Eisenhower Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eisenhower Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.irdinc.com/showcase/5_safety_systems.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100906192147/http://www.coloradodot.info/news/news-releases/30-years-for-johnson-tunnel to http://www.coloradodot.info/news/news-releases/30-years-for-johnson-tunnel

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eisenhower Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131009220736/http://www.airdisaster.com/reports/ntsb/AAR71-04.pdf to http://www.airdisaster.com/reports/ntsb/AAR71-04.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

—2601:300:4301:4C40:6428:2677:3BC:B862 (talk) 00:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, and they appear to be correct. If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 16:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

General Criticism

This is one of the most poorly written wiki entries I've read for a major U.S. landmark.

The sourcing is suspect and the actual content reads like a billboard.

I will propose some edits, but look forward to the followup from whoever maintains this. 23.121.67.196 (talk) 22:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]