Talk:Einsteinium/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: FREYWA 02:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

This is my first review...I have no idea of what to expect. But still, you can leave comments and I will address them. Check out my peer review as well. Good luck, editors. FREYWA 02:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Ready to review.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

    Done

   You have some specifics in mind? Nergaal (talk) 02:53, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

1. B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

    Done

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   90 sources. Real good.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   One per paragraph - even better then the rule of thumb (one per section).

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Per the guidelines, this has everything.

   B. Focused:

   Again, some specifics would be helpful. Nergaal (talk) 02:53, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   The 4th criterion is equivalent to not looking like anything. And this article does.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Obviously.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   With something dealing with US confidential, there is no question on the pictures.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Specifically, for section 1A, in the section on organomettalic compounds it says, "So experiments, have been performed..." and the comma there is something I want you to fix. For section 3B the section on the synthesis in nuclear explosions is a wall and looks intimidating. FREYWA 08:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Worked a bit on both. Nergaal (talk) 17:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Hold it - where is the a parameter for EsOCl (look at Chemical compounds → Halides → the last paragraph)? The prose is really good. Remove that "a = " and I will list einsteinium as a good article soon. I have to remove the a parameter myself. Then it will be a good article. FREYWA 08:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)