Jump to content

Talk:Einkorn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Einkorn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 20:01, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 23:18, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


This article has multiple issues. There is barely anything about the wild plant itself, no description, no ecology, no information how to distinguish the wild form (or the domestic form) with related species. No information on taxonomy (who described the species? Subspecies? etc.). Very little on nutrition, nothing on modern uses (which exist). There is a long "History" section that goes into all sorts of aspects that should be covered in dedicated sections (Taxonomy, Description, Ecology, History of human uses, nutrition, etc). There is information in the lead that is not repeated in the article. I have to quick-fail this for now, as the article is not even close (particularly in terms of coverage). --Jens Lallensack (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To start: the comment on the History contradicts the earlier comment; I've reorganised it along the lines you suggest, which took a few minutes. The other items should not take very long either. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.