Talk:Eindhoven Airport

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eindhoven Airport article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands

Military history: Aviation / Dutch / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Dutch military history task force
	European military history task force

Untitled

This needs a photo of the front entrance. WhisperToMe (talk) 01:20, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The airport is closing somewhere around 22:30 (or at 22:00 I'm not sure), and only opening at 6:30!! (this is not sure either). It should be notated.--Dadooo0 (talk) 10:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The airport's developements since 2011 are not covered at all. The extention should be covered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.155.68.105 (talk) 14:00, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of refs for existing routes

RgSim (talk · contribs) and an anon have been removing refs from this and other airports, commenting "standardized; only refs for new routes or to be terminated routes" and "Existing routes don't need a ref".

What is the standard or other rationale being spoken of? Batternut (talk) 07:23, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BURDEN always applies Andrewgprout (talk) 17:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of WP:BURDEN, running routes don't require references unless they're charters. This is because live routes are very easy to track and verify and it is only in the case of changes to these routes that references are needed - such as new route or routes ending etc. In the case of these Ryanair routes in question, they have been running for a while which is easily evident through Flightradar24 and the likes. References like these just clutter the page up. RgSim (talk) 06:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How's about adding a reference to such a site at the top of the table. If one site conveniently lists all current routes that's a excellent thing. I don't think WP:BURDEN should be ignored. Thanks for talking! Batternut (talk) 06:50, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed! That would be a good idea. I think in the case of Ryanair (and other big airlines like easyJet etc etc) then a lot of people know their full schedules can be easily found on their websites and by doing a mock booking from there. I don't think we need a lot of links to the Ryanair homepage!! :) RgSim (talk) 12:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamo Festival

Wasn't the Dynamo Music Festival held each year on this airport? 84.62.20.61 (talk) 18:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]