This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LuxembourgWikipedia:WikiProject LuxembourgTemplate:WikiProject LuxembourgLuxembourg
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country
Apparently the editor did not answer :-) But your point is well-taken. I'll try to expand the lede. I am sure my draft will be edited, if others see things differently.--Ereunetes (talk) 19:11, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge with Dutch Revolt. Marjolein 't Hart, in Dutch Wars of Independence, writes: "[H]istorians who study the earlier decades - stopping in 1609 or even before - preferring 'Dutch Revolt', while works that include the last phases of the war tend to speak of 'the Eighty Years War'. . . For a while the term Eighty Years War was viewed as rather old-fashioned, but it has been revived by a recent internationalist perspective looking, for example, at the struggle from the viewpoint of the Spanish opponent or ... stressing the global character of the fighting." Srnec (talk) 12:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Currently we have two articles that appear to be about exactly the same thing. They're not supposed to be—and they aren't quite—but your average reader will wonder what the difference is supposed to be. I don't have time to fix it, since both articles are long and the fix is probably not too easy. Splitting overlong articles is secondary to reconciling our two main articles. Srnec (talk) 23:51, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the current title is wrong, it makes it look like one war that was 45 years long called "Eighty Years' War" from 1566-1609, while there is another war also called "Eighty Year's War". So this article definitely needs to be renamed to something, as the current formulation is wrong and misleading. -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 05:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Well the phrase "first phase" may look awkward. But the title surely needs to be fixed. Please suggest other appropriate titles. ( How about the word stage instead of phase) ? Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 07:52, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Options': Merge it so it's not split into multiple articles. Most obvious choice. If the other suggested merge works, try taht. Or rename Eighty Years' War during the period 1566–1609. Agree the "phase" wording is awkward, but that current name is just unacceptably misleading. — SMcCandlish ☺☏¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
Oppose It's a rather convoluted title, I'm afraid. Yes, technically the current title could be construed as meaning that the war only lasted 1566-1609. But only for someone who doesn't actually click the link and reads the first sentence of the lead, ei a moron in a hurry. If the scope of the article is the parenthetical time period, the current title is as clear and concise as it needs to be. PeterIsotalo20:55, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Move of the page history of this page was mismanaged
This article was originally part of an article I wrote years ago, entitled "Eighty Years' War" (see page history of that page). The powers that be decided that this article was too long and so split it up (see the archived discussion). But apparently when the split was done the so-called page history (history of previous contributions) was deleted (See the history section that only goes back to the date of the copy-and-paste). This is expressly forbidden under the Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Fixing cut-and-paste moves rules. My rights as an author have been violated. I want this addressed. I'll therefore put the banner mentioned in this Administrators article on this page.--Ereunetes (talk) 19:56, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
