Talk:Egon Christophersen

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Egon Christophersen redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Biography / European / German / World War II

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Germany

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This redirect is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Flawlesslogic.com as a source

I suspect a website that identifies itself as Racialist does not qualify as a WP:RS. This section alone would seem to disqualify it: "Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or with no editorial oversight. Such sources include websites and publications expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, or promotional in nature, or which rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions." Unless Jim Sweeney is claiming the site has editorial oversight and fact-checking? JanetteDoe (talk) 12:07, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability & no sources

Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS cannot be found: link. Hence the redirect. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:26, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]