Talk:Egan

See also section

@BarcodeIII: the MOS:DABSEEALSO clearly states that See also entries can include easily-confused terms and possible misspellings. There is no requirement that terms be related etymologically. Egen (disambiguation) is a valid See also item for this page. (pinging @Clarityfiend: who has recently edited this section.) Leschnei (talk) 22:36, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Leschnei. Per MOS:DABSEEALSO, "terms which can be confused with Title" belong in the See also section. This is a common and well-established practice. See, for example, Smyth and Smiths in Smith#See also. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]