Talk:Efferent nerve fiber
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the illustration shouldn't it be changed from PNS to CNS? "In the peripheral nervous system, afferent and efferent projections are always from the perspective of the spinal cord" to "In the central nervous system, afferent and efferent projections are always from the perspective of the spinal cord". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pawpawseed66 (talk • contribs) 22:53, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Efferent nerve fiber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120321002102/http://otm.oxfordmedicine.com/ to http://otm.oxfordmedicine.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Mnemonics
[edit]Overview
[edit]There are two mnemonics given, in different sections, with no particular link. That's not good. —DIV (1.145.74.111 (talk) 04:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC))
1st mnemonic
[edit]- In the context of a given brain region, afferents are arriving fibers while efferents are exiting fibers.
This is pure alliteration. OK. —DIV (1.145.74.111 (talk) 04:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC))
2nd mnemonic
[edit]The article claims:
- Ad and ex give an easy mnemonic device for remembering the relationship between afferent and efferent: afferent connection arrives and an efferent connection exits.
What a nonsense! "Ad" is a distraction in that supposed mnemonic, rather than a cue. Yes, if you're a linguist, knowing the etymology will explain the meaning, but that's nothing to do with a mnemonic!
"A&E" (British English abbreviation for Accident & Emergency) would make more sense. But really the mnemonic is simply in the alliteration: Afferent connection Arrives; Efferent connection Exits. Of course, one still has to understand where the arriving/exiting is taking place!
—DIV (1.145.74.111 (talk) 03:58, 1 December 2022 (UTC))
Support good-faith IP editors: insist that Wikipedia's administrators adhere to Wikipedia's own policies on keeping range-blocks as a last resort, with minimal breadth and duration, in order to reduce adverse collateral effects; support more precisely targeted restrictions such as protecting only articles themselves, not associated Talk pages, or presenting pages as semi-protected, or blocking only mobile edits when accessed from designated IP ranges.