Talk:Effects of Hurricane Charley in South Carolina/GA1

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Looks good.

   B. MoS compliance:

   Nothing that caught my eye. Good job on converting all measurements.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Generally good, but refs 4 and 11 are missing copyright dates, and reference 19's publisher is not correct.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   "The storm made landfall in southwestern Florida at maximum strength, thus making it the strongest hurricane to hit the United States since Hurricane Andrew struck Florida twelve years before, in 1992." Needs a reference, as well as "No fatalities occurred."

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   On hold for now, just improve references and such and I'll pass. Malinaccier (talk) 22:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

 Done Thanks for the review! Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 12:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Passing now. Congrats! Malinaccier (talk) 15:14, 3 August 2008 (UTC)