Jump to content

Talk:Edwin Lutyens

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Picture of Deanery Garden

[edit]
  • Firstly it's not called Deanery Garden House - it was originally simply "Deanery Garden" and is now known as "the Deanery".
  • The picture is a "charcoaled" version of an early copyright Country Life picture. (There is now a window to the right of the large chimney.) If I knew how I'd upload a CC picture of my own.

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Social Housing in Westminster

[edit]

No mention of this on the page: http://housingprototypes.org/project?File_No=GB017 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.94.0.4 (talk) 14:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait

[edit]

This is of poor quality and a better representation of him would be preferable.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 04:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brickyard Office

[edit]

If of any interest I've just uploaded Lutoffice8Jl6-3786.jpg to the Commons and have included an image of the plaque on the building recording Lutyen's interest.I particularly like the history behind this image as it shows Lutyen's in a different light. WyrdLight (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Lead

[edit]

Looking at this article, which needs a great deal of work, I'm particularly struck by the concluding comment on his racism, which ends the lead. Whilst he certainly held racist views, they were commonly held by many (most?) people of his class and of his time. Are his views on race really amongst the most important facts of note about the greatest English architect of the twentieth century? KJP1 (talk) 10:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it doesn't belong in the lead and should certainly be rephrased from a direct accusation, for WP:NPOV. It should probably go lower down in a wider description of his reaction to India and Indian architecture, or in the context of his difficulties with his much more liberal wife, who was infatuated with an Indian, Krishnamurti for years. Certainly a lot of work for someone... - Aegoceras (talk) 11:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It would indeed sit much more suitably in a section on his work at Delhi and I shall move it. The wider issues with the article will have to wait the attentions of other, or until I recover sufficient wiki-enthusiasm. Are you a Bristolian? The article on the splendid Wills Hall is quite nice. KJP1 (talk) 15:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. No Lutyens works around here though! -Aegoceras (talk) 22:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page number required for ref 1 - from Stamp, Gavin (2006). The Memorial to the Missing of the Somme

[edit]

Does anyone have access to Stamp, Gavin (2006). The Memorial to the Missing of the Somme. It's our no.1 reference and an important assertion; it would be best if we could specify the page number (and at the same time have someone check that Stamp did indeed write such a thing). thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:21, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

p=10, "the greatest British architect of the twentieth (or of any other) century." I'll put a page reference in. KJP1 (talk) 16:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Edwin Lutyens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Edwin Lutyens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Would it be worth creating a navigation template at Template:Edwin Lutyens or Template:Lutyens? Here is an attempt, based on another example.

This is based on our existing articles, particularly Edwin Lutyens and List of works by Edwin Lutyens, and Category:Works of Edwin Lutyens, but doubtless some redlinks should be added for items for which there is no article yet. I'd welcome some comments before making this live. 01:02, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

I'm no expert on templates, but to me it looks excellent and I think it would be of great help to interested readers. Is the intention it sit at the end of the Lutyens article, a la William Burges? I think the addition of redlinks would also encourage editors to go about filling in the gaps. KJP1 (talk) 13:26, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I love it. I'd certainly be absolutely fine with including it in my articles. The only major criticism I can foresee is the size of it, given the volume of Lutyens' work, which means that not all links will be relevant on all articles. Also, we shouldn't include people/works that don't have articles and aren't likely to (on that note, his father is probably notable for his painting, but that would take some research into arty sources; Emily is certainly notable and I'm still surprised she doesn't have an article). If it was up to me, I would group the works by theme (country houses, New Delhi, WWI [or split into war memorials and IWGC], Midland Bank, etc) or period rather than location—as an obvious example, Thiepval should obviously be interpreted alongside his war memorials and IWGC work rather than just as being in France. By the way, we're missing articles on some of his foreign memorials—there's one in Freetown, Sierra Leone, and one in Mbala, Zambia, and a replica cenotaph in Hamilton, Bermuda. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a few tweaks, but no doubt there is more that could be done. I invite someone else to try a different format or arrangement to see if that would be better. Theramin (talk) 23:59, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edwin Lutyens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:53, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Edwin_Lutyens&oldid=1196519027"