Jump to content

Talk:Edwards Aquifer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hannahclimbs. Peer reviewers: Redhairrockstar, The Gneiss Guys.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ryanlcrumley, Msaltingoz, Hayleypc 52, Sokkerchick33, WATERPAX, Arella Li15, Steadmac, Sateinh, Grohmant, Jonesin2, Bcgeo5234, Bassioum, Ceoases, Carusope1, Gombertc, Ajmcc91, Ivahawk, Becraftr, Jason Brandes, LaurenBomeisl, Abushnel, Robertopennington, Serchans, CharlieBeans. Peer reviewers: Becraftr.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

it cycles about 500,000 gallons (1,900,000 liters) of water a year and directly serves about two million people

500,000 gallons per day is a crop in the bucket for 2 million people. Is this number correct? What is the source for this stat? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.91.123.58 (talk • contribs) .

Probably meant acre-feet; slightly different. Will source and fix in a sec. Kuru talk 00:37, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Yes, as written, a quarter of a gallon of water per person per year would have been a bit low. Kuru talk 00:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity?

[edit]

You'll notice that the map I added is for the "Edwards-Trinity aquifer system". That's how the data is presented in the source given on image description page. Someone in a position to know might want to expand on that a little in the article. The extent shown is more than the article discusses, and appears to be based on a common geology of the formation(s) responsible for the aquifer system. This article as it stands today is mighty light on geologic details, but an aquifer is a geologic phenomenon before it is a hydrologic one. I.e., the pipes have to be there before they can carry any water. --Kbh3rdtalk 07:16, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

San Antonio's dependence on the Edwards Aquifer

[edit]

FTA:

One of the major cities on the aquifer is San Antonio, America's 7th largest city, with a population of over 1 million. San Antonio is fully dependent on the Edwards Aquifer for their municipal, industrial and daily use.

According to http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2015/may/18/sharlene-leurig/water-expert-says-austin-only-city-arid-western-us/ "the [San Antonio Water System] taps seven water sources, topped by the underground Edwards Aquifer, which provided 77 percent of the water in 2014." 77% is a lot but it hardly constitutes being "fully dependent" TerraFrost (talk) 01:52, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Edwards Aquifer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Edwards Aquifer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Edwards_Aquifer&oldid=1196510866"