Talk:Edward Elgar/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 16:20, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 16:20, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]I've now read through this article, but have not checked the citations, or the text in any depth. My first impressions are that this is a possible WP:FAC. Nevertheless, this article is a WP:GAN so I will continue my review. As its a comprehensive article, this review is likely to take several days. At this stage I will mostly be highlighting "problems" (if any), so no news is probably good news. Pyrotec (talk) 10:00, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- I made a couple of changes of "Elgar" to "Edward Elgar" and "Edward", respectively, in the Biography, Early years, subsection's discussion of him, his parents and syblings - "Elgar" did not seem the right identification for one individual in a family named Elgar. However, I did not change all of them. Pyrotec (talk) 20:44, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Overall summary
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria I beleive that this article is a strong candidate for WP:FAC
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Well referenced
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Well referenced
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Well illustrated
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Well illustrated
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I found this an interesting and informative article to review. I'm pleased to be able to grant it GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 20:53, 18 June 2010 (UTC)