Talk:Eduard Sievers
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Untitled
[edit]His name is Eduard Sievers (ending in -s), the genitive of his name should either be Sievers's or Sievers' , actually I don't know which. I would opt for Sievers's, however my sources are contradictory. Not Siever's, which is definitely wrong. Anyway usage ought to be consistent. Symkyn (talk) 07:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Weiner et al. (1994) say: "Nouns ending in s add 's for the singular possessive, e.g. [...] Burns's". So I guess from this point of view (is it the British English point of view?) it would have to be Sievers's Law, I guess. But, consistency is the key word here, that's for sure.
Is there any guideline in the Wikipedia style sheets about this?
- Weiner, E.S.C. and Andrew Delahunty. 1994. The Oxford Guide to English Usage. 2nd ed. London: BCA.