Jump to content

Talk:Edict of Torda/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 14:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this over the next several days. --14:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Checklist

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]
Images
  • All are properly licensed and appropriate for the article
Lede
  • Good summary, no changes needed.
Background
Toward tolerance
  • No changes needed, but I would make the word "jizya" appear in the text, not just the link, if I were you. It's nothing to stand in the way of the GA nomination, just my opinion.
John Sigismund, Dávid and Biandrata
  • "denominational flexibility": this is a quote, but it's not clear who said it. A historian? If so, name that person.
The Edict
  • This section is fine, no changes needed

Everything else looks good to me. After these minor issues are addressed, I'll be happy to promote this article. --Coemgenus (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you four your review. I modified the article in accordance with your above suggestion. Please let me know if any further action is needed. Borsoka (talk) 03:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Looks great, I'll promote it right away. Nice work! --Coemgenus (talk) 18:51, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you again for the review. I highly appreciate your hard work. Borsoka (talk) 03:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]