Talk:Eddontenajon

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography / Communities Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Xoloz (talk) 02:26, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eddontenajon, British Columbia → Eddontenajon – This is unique town name which under WPCanada dab standards should have the comma-province removed; Eddontenajon redirects here, Eddontenajon Lake and the airport can be handled by hatnote. --Relisted. ^walk victor falk^talk 01:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Skookum1 (talk) 05:57, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Superfluous disambiguation per wp:ncdab ^walk victor falk^talk 02:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per User:Born2cycle/UNDAB. WP:CONCISE title already redirects here. --B2C 19:28, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This is a clear case of applying the article title policy and CANSTYLE naming conventions. —seav (talk) 20:32, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.