Talk:Ecumene

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Merge proposal

I propose to merge "Ecumene" and "Oecumene".

Ecumene is Oecumene's derivatives.

Please see this article's notes.--210.139.175.139 (talk) 10:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also propose to extend the definition as a geographical term proposed by the German geographer Friedrich Ratzel, and then heavily used in statistics.--210.139.175.139 (talk) 11:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

almost a disambiguation

is there enough material in the subsections to have a disambiguation page for them?

Ken M Quirici 19:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kquirici (talk • contribs)

Oikoumene in cultural history

How does the use of this term in Mumford and McNeill relate to Alfred L. Kroeber's "The ancient oikoumene as an historic culture aggregate", delivered in 1945 as the annual Huxley Memorial Lecture? Being an influential anthropologist, his definition could well have exerted a considerable influence in the field of cultural history. An example of this is Marshall Hodgson, who makes explicit reference to Kroeber in his own adaption of the term:

I have chosen the term 'Oikoumene', in a sense similar to that latterly used by Alfred Kroeber, not just as an area term but to refer to the Afro-Eurasian agrarian historical complex as having a distinctive interregional articulation in an ever-growing area; there seems to be no other term for this complex at all.

– Marshall Hodgson, The venture of Islam (University of Chicago Press, 1974), vol. I, p. 50

I'm not familiar with Kroeber's original definition myself, but judging from the article and this passage from Hodgson, it must differ significantly from McNeill's conception of ouikoumene (and possibly from Mumford's as well). Can anyone help us out with this?--83.249.242.114 (talk) 12:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Kroeber is prior to Mumford and McNeill but I think it was Toynbee who was influential in the use of oikoumene as a term to describe an extended area where several civilisations were in contact with each other, in Study of History 1933 onwards. McNeill developed this. I would start there with Toynbee. Davdevalle (talk) 15:39, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"cultural geography"

Former section commented out below, pending some indication of how this use is common and NOTABLE instead of simply unpopular jargon coined by a single scholar:

If the section is to be reïncluded, it needs clarification of how "ecumene" supposedly "defines the relations between the geographical and natural environment and the conceptions of nature" because that phrase—as it stands—has no semantic content whatsoever. — $Llywelyn II$ 17:51, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Œ

Per WP:LIGATURE, we just don't use it for our English running text at all. — $Llywelyn II$ 23:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ecumene. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120702151934/http://www.halopedian.com:80/Ecumene to http://www.halopedian.com/Ecumene

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What sort of thing a 'pedia topic is

I added (following "The Greek term") "cited above," bcz WP:NOTaDICT, & placing paren around that phrase makes it a mere clarification, i.e., keeping it from being part of the mainstream of the article's flow.
--Jerzy•t 13:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ecumene. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720153921/http://history.sandiego.edu/gen/soc/technics.html to http://history.sandiego.edu/gen/soc/technics.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]