Talk:Ectropy

woah i tripped ballz. "boners"Kmarinas86 03:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is ridiculously POV and besides that it also seems to have been copy-pasted from another site or a textbook - refers to chapters, etc. I'm too green to tackle it but it needs to be flagged or maybe even deleted. Or just merged with negentropy since they're the exact same thing. 65.65.140.67 (talk) 05:28, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, delete it please, this is pure nonsense. ... A chapter named 'laws' in sarcastic quotation marks, which -without any citation reference- states the 2nd law of thermodynamics is proven wrong. I cannot begin to describe the dangerously poor quality of this article. It is simply feeding false information, in a personal blog-style; this doesn't belong in encyclopedia, but on a personal blog. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.209.51.32 (talk) 14:26, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the nonsensical sections. They were newly added and obviously lifted from a pseudo-science textbook/paper. They had no cited sources and contradicted both established science and the opening section of the article. — Daniel Dunér (talk) 20:32, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added a notability tag to the page, as it is lacking in sources that show that the term 'ectropy' is in use. — Daniel Dunér (talk) 20:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]