Talk:Economy of West Virginia

United States: West Virginia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	West Virginia portal This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Low-importance).

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History

"The effort of unions to organize miners is a violent chapter in the state's history. In 1933, the President of the United States Franklin Delano Roosevelt threatened to call the National Guard in order to forcibly unionize parts of Raleigh County. Nevertheless, labor organizing persisted under the leadership of John L. Lewis and the United Mine Workers."

This sounds strange, the problem was caused by unions, and the president attmpted to unionise to resolve the problem?

HexAmp 08:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Focusing on negative aspects of West Virginia and not actual topic

This article seems to be out of focus on what the topic is. This is not a "poverty in West Virginia" article and I suggest that if someone wants an article on that topic they should create one. This article is about West Virginia's economy and says virtually nothing about things like what the GDP of the state is, what the GDP per capita is, any informative statistics, and any information other than information on how the state is impoverished. This article is simply taking an excuse to bash the state, which wikipedia is not about. I suggest someone change this article or delete it.

76.177.59.210 (talk) 23:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV dispute

The article sounds like it was written by a department of finance. The overall lack of mention of anything negative here seems pretty sketchy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blimeo (talk • contribs) 00:47, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

-NPOV-

The article presents a series of descriptive deceptions. It creates misleading and false a impression using dated statistics that are no longer relevant. With the loss of the coal industry, the article will need revision reflecting that.

As it also appears to present a "sugar coated" viewpoint, as an unethical investment banker may use to sell stock in a failing company. This page is not a place to post "visit West Virginia" advertising.

The article needs extensive revision by persons not financially or emotionally invested in the state. Etc-etc-cte-cte (talk) 15:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)signed by etc-etc-cte-cte[reply]

The paragraph on Protea Biosciences reads like an advertisement. I do not think "up-and-coming" applies, and the Xerox analogy is poor (there is no copying involved). The paragraph also has too much scientific detail for an article on West Virginia. A simple mention of this small company would be sufficient. MagnusPalmblad (talk) 15:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Economy of West Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110105064834/http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/national-top-public to http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/national-top-public

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]