Talk:Eastern Catholic liturgy
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eastern Catholic liturgy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from Eastern Catholic liturgy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 January 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 13:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Second Vatican Council tried to undo the latinization of Eastern Catholic liturgy? Source: "Reflections on Vatican II's Unitatis Redintegratio and Orienalium Ecclesiarum
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman
- Comment 1: QPQ coming soon!
- Comment 2: Mandarax, thank you. Freudian slip; one of the sources translates the Vatican document as removing "undue" latinization. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:54, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Created by Pbritti (talk). Self-nominated at 01:42, 13 December 2022 (UTC).
Length, date ok. Close paraphrase check ok. QPQ still pending. But regarding the hook, I don't find any sentence that explicitly states that SVC wanted to undo latinization of Eastern Catholic liturgy. I can, not being an expert on the subject, kinda get it by reading a few sentences but for the hook it would be good to have at least one explicit sentence. --Soman (talk) 15:56, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Soman: Thanks for the heads up and prompt review! QPQ done and added above. I revised a sentence in the article such that it more clearly reflected the fact expressed in the hook. Sourcing on the hook and citation of that sentence remains the same. Sentence now reads, "Orientalium Ecclesiarum also sought to undo "mutilations" accrued within Eastern Catholic liturgies through latinization and ethnic interests..." Let me know if there are any other barriers to passing this DYK. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Many thanks, good to go. --Soman (talk) 20:32, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Soman: Thanks for the heads up and prompt review! QPQ done and added above. I revised a sentence in the article such that it more clearly reflected the fact expressed in the hook. Sourcing on the hook and citation of that sentence remains the same. Sentence now reads, "Orientalium Ecclesiarum also sought to undo "mutilations" accrued within Eastern Catholic liturgies through latinization and ethnic interests..." Let me know if there are any other barriers to passing this DYK. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- C-Class Indian Christianity work group articles
- Low-importance Indian Christianity work group articles
- Indian Christianity work group articles
- C-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- Low-importance Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- High-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- C-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles