Talk:East and West Blockhouses/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 08:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Reviewing. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Toolbox checks -- no dab/EL issues.
Structure -- logical/standard for this type of article.
Prose/content
- Copyedited as usual, pls let me know any concerns.
- "The West Blockhouse was destroyed in the 19th century..." -- "destroyed" sounds like a natural disaster or act of war, would "demolished" be more appropriate?
- Following on, there are no visible remains of the West Blockhouse then?
Sources -- appear reliable and suitably formatted.
Images -- no licensing issues.
Another nice addition to the Device Fort series -- just a couple of points before I pass it, Hc. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Cheers! Changes made as suggested. I think we're on the home straight now for the Device Forts... not that many left to get up to GA! :) Hchc2009 (talk) 17:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Great -- passing this one. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)