Talk:East Woodhay

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hampshire Low‑importance

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

I've tried to cleanup this article a lot, in line with Wikipedia guidelines, and this has meant removing some un-needed links. Please note the article should eb about East Woodhay - info about the village of East End should be placed in a seperate article about East End! UkPaolo 19:15, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree. When I Started the article originally, it was about East End, but it grew to be about the wider area. I must split it off. -- user:Matt.whitby

Just seen you're the main person to have edited the article - well congrats, it's a v. informative lil article! Yes, it would be nice for an article on East End to be split off... I'm not sufficiently knowledgeable on the area to distinguish what content belongs where - but good luck in doing so! UkPaolo 19:39, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"The Chase"

There is much more information about "The Chase" in the external links, some of which could be included in this article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:04, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on East Woodhay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of long quote in the 1830 history subsection.

The extended quote in the History subsection 1830 doesn’t seem to add much in the way of information to the article. Around half of the quote is focussed on West Woodhay, and so is almost certainly inappropriate for this article. The quote in general feels very much like travel writing in a not particularly helpful style for this article - does the reader really need to know it was “dark” and there was “mild weather” on one specific night of the year in 1830? Mxtt.prior (talk) 22:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]