Talk:East Bay Regional Park District

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Protected areas

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Berkeley Hills is the correct toponym

The ridgeline upon which several parks are located is in fact named the Berkeley Hills. If the issue was whether or not they are above Oakland as well as Berkeley, this fact has been retained. Tmangray (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have never proved your assertion that the term 'Oakland Hills' is incorrect. My edits on this page bypass the confusion you generate on this topic and are factually correct.--Fizbin (talk) 05:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is incorrect. It has not been recognized by the USGS nor any professional geographers. What is YOUR proof? Do you have a AAA map of the area? How about a USGS topographic map? Do you see anything there that says "Oakland Hills? You must either be a newcomer to the Bay Area, some sort of Oakland booster, or possibly someone who carries their dislike of Berkeley out of bounds. Tmangray (talk) 05:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The text I used bypasses the whole issue while giving readers an accurate and straightforward account of where to find the parks - your edits do not. And neither a newcomer, an Oakland booster or a Berkeley hater - I just prefer to eliminate ambiguity, which is what my edits do and yours do not.--Fizbin (talk) 05:51, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "issue" about the proper name. Neither is there ambiguity. The cities are mentioned together with the name of the range which runs along their eastern limits. You're censoring a proper toponym without any authority or rationale. Tmangray (talk) 05:58, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map needed

The page really needs a map because this district encompasses many different sites and facilities. There is a good one on the East Bay Regional Park District Web page, but I don't know whether it meets Wikipedia's public domain requirements. Bruin2 (talk) 15:26, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

list of parks

Here is the list of parks from the EBRPD website: Anthony Chabot Antioch/Oakley Ardenwood Historic Farm Bay Point Big Break Bishop Ranch Black Diamond Mines Briones Brooks Island Browns Island Brushy Peak Carquinez Strait Castle Rock Claremont Canyon Contra Loma Coyote Hills Crockett Hills Crown Beach/Crab Cove Visitor Center Cull Canyon Del Valle Diablo Foothills Don Castro Dry Creek Pioneer Dublin Hills Eastshore Five Canyons Garin Hayward Huckleberry Botanic Kennedy Grove Lake Chabot Las Trampas Leona Canyon Little Hills Martin Luther King Jr. Martinez Middle Harbor Miller/Knox Mission Peak Morgan Territory Ohlone Oyster Bay Pleasanton Ridge Point Isabel Point Pinole Quarry Lakes Redwood Roberts Round Valley Shadow Cliffs Sibley Sobrante Ridge Sunol Sycamore Valley Temescal Tilden/Botanic Garden/Tilden Nature Area Vargas Plateau Vasco Caves Waterbird Wildcat CanyonMercurywoodrose (talk) 03:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added back the linked list here. if someone thinks its redundant, i disagree, but i also feel we could easily create a stand alone list, List of East Bay Regional Parks, as another navigation aide.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:31, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I support your idea of a stand-alone list for park names. Consider using a table format with one column for the park name, another for tan image related to the park, a third for the nearest large community, and a fourth to show distinguishing characteristics or features of the individual park. Bruin2 (talk) 06:06, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on East Bay Regional Park District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110805005426/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/08/15/MNGA988H5O1.DTL to http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/08/15/MNGA988H5O1.DTL

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on East Bay Regional Park District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]