Talk:EastEnders

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the EastEnders article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 3 months

EastEnders was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 23, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
July 31, 2006	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
October 11, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
November 2, 2006	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
March 9, 2007	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
March 7, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept
May 22, 2010	Good article reassessment	Delisted
May 17, 2017	Peer review	Reviewed
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 19, 2010.
Current status: Delisted good article

EastEnders

This article is within the scope of WikiProject EastEnders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the popular BBC soap opera EastEnders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EastEndersWikipedia:WikiProject EastEndersTemplate:WikiProject EastEndersEastEnders

Tasks for WikiProject EastEnders:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Expand : All articles listed in Category:Stub-Class EastEnders articles and Category:EastEnders articles in need of real-world perspective
Other :
- Improve to FA standard: EastEnders: E20
- Improve to GA standard: EastEnders
- Maintain: List of EastEnders characters (2023), List of EastEnders characters, List of former EastEnders characters, List of awards and nominations received by EastEnders
- Get involved in the Wikipedia EastEnders Project.

Television: British High‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

BBC High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

England Top‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Albert Square was copied or moved into EastEnders with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Vandalism

I saw that the page had been vandalized, the first paragraph was replaced with an offensive comment and then a link to a twitter page. I removed the comment, but as the original paragraph had been deleted, I was not able to replace it. The user who replaced it was User:Flimgier, so if anyone can contact them, please do so.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TrippCeyssens (talk • contribs)

Residents

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Edit request to add hatnote {{Redirect|East Enders|residents of the East End area|East End of London}}. And while you're at it, maybe add the semi-protected shackle icon in the top right. --2001:1C06:19CA:D600:FE96:1771:8BA6:4C16 (talk) 19:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you. Liu1126 (talk) 21:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --2001:1C06:19CA:D600:F531:95C3:3AD3:E361 (talk) 17:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Watts

why on Sharon Watts character page you put former character she hasnt left for good cause the boss said on digital spy after the episode aired that she is only gone for a while and will be back and he said there are lots more to come from Sharon Linda Kathy Stacey Suki and Denise 2A02:C7C:A452:3900:81D1:4DFC:8175:E1DD (talk) 22:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Black characters

The assertion that Coronation Street only began to feature black characters after Eastenders started to air is factually incorrect. The black character Shirley Armitage was a Coronation Street regular from 1983 to 1989. Cables93 (talk) 08:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EastEnders logo needs changing as it updated from todag

eastenders is now using the new bbc logo in its titles so if someone could help update it please 82.33.190.122 (talk) 18:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The Queen Victoria" deleted!

I've noticed that the page "The Queen Victoria" has been turned into a redirect following a request to delete in October. This leaves about 300 pages linking to "Queen Vic Fire Week" via that redirect and others. My feeling is that the Queen Vic deserves at least a section of its own, if not a whole page, but I haven't watched EastEnders since 1986, so I'm not in the best place to decide how to proceed. Could we convene a discussion of the regular editors of EastEnders-related pages to figure out how best to move forward? Pinging @DaniloDaysOfOurLives and FishLoveHam: Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page lacked substantial coverage from reliable secondary sources, which are necessary for creating a separate article. The topic of "Queen Victoria Fire Week" was retained, as it is supported by the secondary sources required for an article. As a compromise, expanding the section on Queen Victoria Fire Week to include additional information about the Queen vic itself could be considered if more reliable sources are found. Jontesta (talk) 23:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But you've missed a very important point. "The Queen Victoria" isn't a "fork" or subtopic of "Queen Vic Fire Week"; it's one of the main locations of "EastEnders", a popular British soap opera. To delete it is a bit like deleting "London" on the grounds that the same material is better covered by "Great Fire of London".

I don't deny that the article needs work, but a quick google will convince you that substantial coverage exists in numerous independent sources. It could conceivably be reconstituted as a subsection of one of the other pages on EastEnders locations, but I think the best solution would be to reverse the deletion and move forward from there. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 23:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a great analogy. London is real. The Queen Vic is fiction and does not exist outside of Eastenders plots, Queen Vic Fire Week being one of them. A section as suggested by Jean-de-Nivelle, seems like a reasonable idea. It could be argued that the Queen Vic could be treated as a "character". --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 10:49, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see that the fictionality of EastEnders particularly invalidates the analogy. The Queen Vic isn't just a fictional pub though - it exists as a real film set (in fact more than one), and the article as it existed until recently contained many details about the physical reality of the set and the real-world development of the fictional place that would be out of place in an article about a particular set of fictional events.

I'm not convinced that it makes sense to treat a location as a character, but if we did so, how would that affect the resolution of the current situation? Would the character get a page of its own (like Peggy Mitchell) or would it be listed as one of the EastEnders characters introduced in 1985? Can we learn from articles about other fictional places, like "Hogwarts", or "The Rovers Return"? Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 11:05, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jean-de-Nivelle Start by giving the pub its own section, perhaps under "Setting". It there later proves to be enough content and sources coverage specific to the Queen Vic, then perhaps there is an argument for restoring a separate article, and moving content to there.. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 15:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]