Talk:Earthquake insurance

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Earthquake insurance article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Earthquakes Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Earthquake insurance appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 May 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that residents of California buy more earthquake insurance than residents of any other U.S. state?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2004/May.

Wikipedia

A discussion of the entities covered by earthquake insurance is needed. For example, in California the insurance covers only home owners. Condo owners can cover the interior of their unit and its contents but the home owners association does not have access to similar policies as other home owners. So a condo owner is at risk if the association does not rebuild and if the other owners do not have the means to restore their interiors. 68.75.28.144 12:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all sure that this article isn't US-centric. "Most ordinary...policies do not cover earthquake loss" -- this perhaps is true in the US but not in the rest of the world. Also, the "New Zealand" section isn't particularly accurate -- all insurance covers EQ risks, but the EQC takes levies from private insurance and covers the first NZ$100k of damage caused by natural distasters (plus NZ$20k of contents), with the commercial insurer covering the remainder of claims. The EQC is government backed and covers land damage as well as property damage, but only applies to residential dwellings. This protects the solvency of the insurance companies.Tillsbury (talk) 00:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Earthquake insurance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]