Talk:Earmilk
 | This page has been recently proposed for deletion (26 November 2024) by 172.115.16.132 (talk · contribs) with the comment: All 9 sources used to create the page are not even real sources, they do not establish notability and barely even mention the topic. There is nothing online upon a closer inspection. Correct me if I am wrong. Self proclaimed publication. There was no discussion to create the article, and if there would have been one- it would have never been created in the first place or pass any moderation whatsoever. A site with fake paid news, using Wikipedia for credibility. It does not meet the even loosely WP:Notability It was contested by CanonNi (talk · contribs) on 26 November 2024 with the comment: contesting PROD - sources are definitely real, and discussion is not needed to create articles - open a WP:AFD if you still think the page warrants deletion |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Article Creation
[edit]I found 49 Wikipedia articles that quote Earmilk in the text (See "What Links Here"). There are another 300 Wikipedia articles or so that cite Earmilk in the reflist. I'm looking for articles not published by Earmilk that discuss Earmilk's history and readership, if anyone wants to help. Thanks GreenVolvox (talk) 18:38, 30 October 2018 (UTC)