Talk:Early life of Pedro II of Brazil/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
User Lecen had a lot of courage to create an article focusing on a particular aspect of a person – it is not very common, specially for Brazilian personalities. But he was very competent and created a long article, with relevant information, images and references. Almost everything that is worth to be read about Peter II childhood is there.
Apart from some red links, I think this must be a nominated article.
Reviewer: Tonyjeff (talk) 18:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- This appears to be another "drive-by" review as per Talk:Honório Carneiro Leão, Marquis of Paraná/GA1 and, possibly, Talk:Afonso, Prince Imperial of Brazil/GA1. As with Afonso, Prince Imperial of Brazil message left on "reviewer's talkpage to find out status of review. Pyrotec (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Overall summary
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A comprehensive article and, I suspect, a possible WP:FAC candidate.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Well referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Well referenced.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Well illustrated.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Well illustrated.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I'm awarding this article GA-status. I think it has potential at WP:FAC, its your decision but if you do decide to try, put it through WP:PR first. Congratulations on the quality of the article. Pyrotec (talk) 09:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you Pyrotec for taking the time to review and make some corrections to the article! • Astynax talk 09:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)