Talk:EUR, Rome
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rename to "EUR, Rome"
[edit]I can't imagine very many people from EUR know what the letters stand for, and even if they did everyone just calls the place EUR. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 12:05, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I think I'll withdraw this proposal. Looks like I'm not winning this one. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 00:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
EUR, Rome → EUR – This is the only article which is actually called EUR. The other are just abbreviations for the full names. While EUR was originally an abbreviation, the original words have mostly been forgotten and the district is simply known as EUR. That EUR is an abbreviation for euro can be dealt with with a hat note. Not all currency codes redirect the their respective currencies (see IEP, CAD and FRF for examples). — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 19:24, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose IEP and FRF are dead currencies, the Computer Aided Design is clearly more important than the Canadian Dollar and I think the Euro currency is more important than this article.
- Strong oppose it is not WP:PRIMARYUSAGE. The Euro is clearly the primary usage, since this is a currency symbol for it. 70.24.251.71 (talk) 04:27, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- The currency can't be the primary topic as the currency isn't called EUR and it's symbol is €, not EUR. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 14:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- The primary topic of 007 is James Bond (character), even though the article is not called "007" and there exists 007 (disambiguation), where several other things have article names "007". The fact that the primary topic has multiple names means that the article has to reside at some name, not necessarily the same as base name you would seem to indicate. Primary usage and WP:COMMONNAME are not the same issue. Clearly EUR is used as a currency code, the same way that RMB, USD are. 70.24.251.71 (talk) 15:52, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- The currency can't be the primary topic as the currency isn't called EUR and it's symbol is €, not EUR. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 14:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose and Speedy close per WP:SNOW. "The fact that an article has a different title is not a factor in determining whether a topic is primary"[1]. The primary topic for EUR, if there is one, is the currency. --Born2cycle (talk) 00:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Fair use candidate from Commons: File:EURCol.jpg
[edit]The file File:EURCol.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at File:EURCol.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 09:46, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Fair use candidate from Commons: File:Roma Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana BW.jpg
[edit]The file File:Roma Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana BW.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at File:Roma Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana BW.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 09:46, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Infobox, template
[edit]The infobox and template here were to an article on the (cancelled) 1942 World Fair; this page is about the (extant) business district of Rome. as we already have an article on the World Fair, (here), I've moved them there. I've added a more suitable infobox also. I trust that is OK with everyone. Moonraker12 (talk) 19:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on EUR, Rome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081211104329/http://www.italgiure.giustizia.it/nir/lexs/1936/lexs_105936.html to http://www.italgiure.giustizia.it/nir/lexs/1936/lexs_105936.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111103100905/http://www.eurspa.it/La-Societa/La-nostra-storia to http://www.eurspa.it/La-Societa/La-nostra-storia
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111105110621/http://www.eur.roma.it/storia.php to http://www.eur.roma.it/storia.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
The images just turned into words, I do not know how to fix it, please if someone can do it I would really apprecciate it.