This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This link: UPC Supplemental Encodings
from the Uniform Code Council (now part of the GS1 standards group) forms part of the specification for the 5 character supplemental encodings used by UPC and EAN GTIN codes. It suggests some slight differences is the barcode formation than that currently on this article, if no-one objects, I shall be amending the article to conform to this document.
It's important that I point out that I can no longer find this specification live on the internet, I have double checked it's original veracity at the wayback machine, but I cannot find a current copy on the GS1 group website. It may be available there for group members only.
The specific corrections that are required: The start code is actually 1011, rather than 101, and each character is separated by 01 rather than as the article suggests, each character having a 1 prepended and a 0 appended. The technical difference that this makes is that the article suggests that there is always a 0 at the end of the symbol, which is incorrect. Also, the description in the article that there is a checksum encoded in the pattern is not quite correct. The specification is clear that this is a parity pattern to facilitate checking, but it is not intended as a checksum of the data. David ORourke (talk) 08:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]