Talk:E/I

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This redirect is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Regulations on children's television programming in the United States
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Regulations on children's television programming in the United States

E/I with digital multicasting

If, say, a TV station had one HD feed and one 24/7 weather-only SD feed, could they carry 9 hours (3+6) of E/I programming on the main channel and none on the weather subchannel? --Libertyernie2 01:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Correct that applies to the station total not each subchannel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.143.237.146 (talk) 10:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So the weather feed, because it repeats, only needs the minimum 3 hours, not six? MMetro (talk) 23:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

E/I Bug

What is the point of the E/I Bug? Is there supposed to be something educational about looking at a stupid logo that obscures the program? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.20.216.186 (talk) 11:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's there to teach boys and girls about the effects of burn-in on plasma television displays. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 01:18, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ten words. Nineteen syllables. Wikipedia. Is. Not. A. Forum. For. General. Discussions. Of. Things. --69.248.1.200 (talk) 22:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the original poster is pointing out a hole in the article, not starting a general discussion. I too would like to know why the E/I Bug is mandated by the law.Shadzane (talk) 15:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wcfn10022005 wxalert.jpg

Image:Wcfn10022005 wxalert.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saved By The Bell?

Saved By The Bell is running on the CW network with the e/i bug in Greenville, SC. I really don't see Zack and Screech can be considered educational or informative. --Razmear (talk) 11:16, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is already explained in the article why this happens. I think the name of E/I should be changed to Educational & Innefective. Lol. In Correct (talk) 15:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

Accoring to the FCC links in the article, it's "informational", not "informative". --Stfg (talk) 12:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In Other Nations:

I always wondered: what the equivalent to E/I is in other nations such as those in Europe? In Correct (talk) 15:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on E/I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:12, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on E/I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050930144427/http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/spgt803.html to http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/spgt803.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]