Talk:Dynamization

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

I saw the red link to static data structure, so I added a very short stub. I'm not sure it should be a seperate article, hence the merge request. Oppinions? Ripper234 09:51, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that dynamization can potentially be a very diverse topic as there are many way of converting a static data structure into a dynamic one - decomposition is just one exmaple. That is why I decided not to cerate a separate topic for decomposition. In addition, static data strucuture can be a separate page that servers more like a road map - while there may not be many things to say besides the generic description given here, there can be links to the many static structures that exist. If neither page is developed much int he future, it can probably be combined with out much loss. IlyaTheMuromets 22:25, 8 January 2007 (EST)