Talk:Dvorichna settlement hromada/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Miguelsa12 (talk · contribs) 19:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I'm planning to review this article. Best regards, Miguel (talk) 19:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
First review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I think this article meets all the criteria below. Congratulations!
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Review passed.
- Pass or Fail:
--Miguel (talk) 19:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Miguelsa12: Wow, thank you so much for reviewing! Was there really nothing that needed to be changed about the article, not even grammar, to make it GA? If so, that's a first for me 🙂 Cheers! Johnson524 01:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Johnson524: I don't think grammar (or prose in general) has to be changed. The article covers the main aspects of the proposed topic (an administrative division in Ukraine), all the info is referenced with reliable sources in accordance to the MOS, etcetera. If you want, you may investigate and add more info to upgrade it to Featured Article. Best regards, Miguel (talk) 17:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Miguelsa12: I think I am going to hold off on looking at Featured Status as long as the war is ongoing here, but I do appreciate the encouragement 😁 Thank you again for reviewing, cheers! Johnson524 18:08, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Johnson524: I don't think grammar (or prose in general) has to be changed. The article covers the main aspects of the proposed topic (an administrative division in Ukraine), all the info is referenced with reliable sources in accordance to the MOS, etcetera. If you want, you may investigate and add more info to upgrade it to Featured Article. Best regards, Miguel (talk) 17:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)