Talk:Duty to warn

Duty to warn is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 January 2020 and 27 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Raeg21, Sailor Grant. Peer reviewers: Sailor Grant.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

USA-centric

This article fails to mention whether this duty exists in non-U.S. legal systems. --Eastlaw (talk) 05:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

its a well known clinical concept taught outside the USA, e.g. UK Earlypsychosis (talk) 08:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is also talked about in Canada and is a limit to confidentiality as outlined in the CPA code. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.110.237.63 (talk) 21:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

merge needed with duty to predict dangerousness

Done.--Yannick (talk) 05:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Earlypsychosis (talk) 08:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think confidentiality is a law

"in the uneasy situation of breaching another law..."

I don't think psychologists are legally held to confidentiality, it is only a rule of the APA.