Jump to content

Talk:Dunder Mifflin/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
    A minor issue: references should be placed after all punctuation, such as in the infobox.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Format the references so that they include at least the title, URL, publisher, and accessdate.
    This is done. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    However, I would suggest using the default thumbnail size for all of the images, rather than forcing one.
    This is done now too. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Gary King (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Several references are still missing a publisher.
  • "The actual DMI ticker symbol" reference should also use cite web, but you can keep the text preceding the URL.
All done now. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gary King (talk) 17:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "on June 4, 2008., the intranet.}}" — an extra }} there?
  • References 1 and 14 are missing publishers.
Gary King (talk) 05:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Passing. Gary King (talk) 21:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]