Jump to content

Talk:Dulles Technology Corridor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Needs a map

[edit]

This article really needs a map to be added to help provide encyclopedic context. If this cooridor really exists, it must be defined geographically somehow. N2e (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additional notable companies within the corridor

[edit]

Other notable companies within the Dulles Technology Corridor for consideration are:

K12, Inc

VW of America

98.172.20.197 (talk) 14:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also a notable company:

Deltek, Inc.

96.26.98.143 (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stub?

[edit]

After making significant edits to the article, I removed the Stub template. Here are my changes. I'm not sure how to ask WP:WikiProject Business and WP:WikiProject Virginia to reassess the stub status, but hopefully they will. I looked into trying to add a map, but I don't know how to without violating somebody's copyright. --JHP (talk) 03:12, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing?

[edit]

There's a regional office in Crystal City, which places out of this topic. TEDickey (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The topic is "Dulles Technology Corridor" (not "Washington Metropolitan Area"). TEDickey (talk) 09:59, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dulles Technology Corridor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Server Valley

[edit]

Seems to be the same topic. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 05:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DTC isn't Crystal City

[edit]

At least one link for "headquarters" confuses Northern Virginia with the Dulles Technology Center. TEDickey (talk) 17:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

recent edits to lede

[edit]

Besides being blatantly promotional, parts of the edit extended the geographic scope well outside the original topic without providing a reliable source. TEDickey (talk) 00:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It might help to notice that the term Dulles Corridor has been around a while. This 1985 article in the Washington Post for example, uses the term, with a different outline, but starting from the road: "...development has increased markedly along the Dulles corridor. The corridor is defined as the land that runs along the Dulles Access Road and its companion toll road,..." TEDickey (talk) 00:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

70% statistic

[edit]

This article claims otherwise about 70% of the worlds internet traffic running through Dulles. https://blog.telegeography.com/does-70-of-the-worlds-internet-traffic-flow-through-virginia Maybe the claim should be removed? --Krynh (talk) 22:56, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Krynh: After looking into the matter further, I removed the statement from the article. You'll find tons of articles that repeat the 70% statistic, but no methodology or elaboration, which is suspicious. I put some notes at User:Vahurzpu/70 percent of internet traffic; I wouldn't be surprised if this was a case of citogenesis or at least of people dropping qualifications like dates or scopes. Vahurzpu (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]