Talk:Duality (electrical circuits)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Duality (electrical circuits) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

‹See TfM›

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lack of references?

This article was previously marked as lacking any references, but there was a reference at the bottom, so I pulled the tag. Reinderien 00:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Duality and Kirchhoff's Laws

How is the duality of Kirchhopff's laws expressed mathematically? The current law is div J=0. what is the dual for the voltage law?Koilon (talk) 18:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Textual formulation

I would recommend to formulate the duality statements in such a way that the order of variables in the left-hand side and the right-hand side is the same. Schematically: i=G(v) <=> F(i)=v rather than i=G(v) <=> v=F(i). But to be honest, I do not know the convention in this field. 130.89.12.143 (talk) 10:47, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely don't do that. It would be a bad scheme. This article is about duality and dual quantities should be shown in corresponding positions. Spinning Spark 11:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]