Talk:Drying
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Drying article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Strange structure?
[edit]Is it just me, or is the structure of this page a bit off? The two first headers, for starters, are not in the same style. Also, the first part is too long - it should be a short introduction, immediately followed by the links to other parts of the article, I think. I don't really know how to improve it, but maybe someone has suggestions? (Herrific (talk) 15:58, 17 April 2010 (UTC))
- I don't see anything fundamentally wrong with the header. You are right that it seems like two different people wrote them, but they are both fairly important. It could perhaps be shortened. Nevertheless, I removed the "copy edit needed" heading. Someone can re-add or change the article if they think otherwise.Editfromwithout (talk) 01:34, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Blatant advertising
[edit]There are two drying methods listed at the end of the article that are blatant adverts for the companies that are marketing them. Either of them are already covered in the more fundamental categories otherwise listed in the article, so I'm deleting them. Thanks. Davidquick 11 (talk) 22:31, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Link to dehydration page?
[edit]I think we should add a link to the dehydration page: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Dehydration_reaction as the two terms are often used interchangeably. But I am not quite sure where to add it. If nowhere else, then at least under the See Also section (have added that now). EvM-Susana (talk) 17:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Combine Bibliography and References ?
[edit]Can someone combine the Bibliography and References sections? Maybe what is called Bibliography now should rather be called "Further Reading"?EvM-Susana (talk) 17:30, 12 January 2015 (UTC)